Back to Papers

Emerging technologies and the use case: A multi‐year study of drone adoption

Omid Maghazei, Michael Lewis, Torbjørn H. NetlandOperations供应链管理UTD24
Journal of Operations Management2022-06-20ETH Zurich; University of BathDOI
Citations106
Influential3
References64
Semantic Scholar

Abstract Although disruptive “Industry 4.0” technologies often lack a clear business case, vendors are advocating and companies are actively exploring their use in operations settings. The technology management literature suggests that successful adoption derives from an appropriate fit between the specific technology and (1) economic and strategic factors, (2) operational and supply chain factors, and (3) organizational and behavioral factors. Through a five‐year research project, we explore how drones—an archetypal emerging technology supported by a thriving vendor ecosystem—transitioned from early ideas to experimental applications to full adoption in daily operations. We analyze a range of data, including exploratory interviews with drone ecosystem actors, a secondary dataset, and case studies of drone applications in Geberit and IKEA. Key findings relate to our observation that technology adoption patterns for emerging technologies do not always follow the traditional linear logic of technology fit. We find that emerging technologies are characterized by a dynamic interaction between technology push from a thriving ecosystem and market pull from companies exploring meaningful operational and business value using the concept of “use case.” Based on these findings, we contribute to the technology management literature with an alternative technology adoption framework for emerging “Industry 4.0” technologies.

ThrivingVendorEmerging marketsEmerging technologiesBusinessDroneValue propositionMarketingExploratory researchSupply chainKnowledge managementProcess management
Related Papers (8-Dimension Scoring)

Strengthening supply chain resilience during <scp>COVID</scp>‐19: A case study of <scp>JD</scp>.com

Zuo‐Jun Max Shen, Yiqi Sun · Journal of Operations Management

Score: 70

The association between supply chain structure and transparency: A large‐scale empirical study

Jury Gualandris, Annachiara Longoni, Davide Luzzini, Mark Pagell · Journal of Operations Management

Score: 70

Antecedent configurations toward supply chain resilience: The joint impact of supply chain integration and big data analytics capability

Yisa Jiang, Taiwen Feng, Yufei Huang · Journal of Operations Management

Score: 70

Breaking out of the pandemic: How can firms match internal competence with external resources to shape operational resilience?

Yuan Li, Xincheng Wang, Tianyu Gong, Haifeng Wang · Journal of Operations Management

Score: 70

The impact of governmental <scp>COVID</scp>‐19 measures on manufacturers' stock market valuations: The role of labor intensity and operational slack

Lujie Chen, Taiyu Li, Fu Jia, Tobias Schoenherr · Journal of Operations Management

Score: 70

Customer base environmental disclosure and supplier greenhouse gas emissions: A signaling theory perspective

Sining Song, Jie Lian, Keith Skowronski, Tingting Yan · Journal of Operations Management

Score: 70

Developing supply chain resilience through integration: An empirical study on an e‐commerce platform

Yinan Qi, Xiaorui Wang, Min Zhang, Qiang Wang · Journal of Operations Management

Score: 70

Bespoke supply‐chain resilience: The gap between theory and practice

Morris A. Cohen, Shiliang Cui, Sebastian Doetsch, Ricardo Ernst, Arnd Huchzermeier, Panos Kouvelis, Hau L. Lee, Hirofumi Matsuo, Andy A. Tsay · Journal of Operations Management

Score: 70