Back to Papers

Customer base environmental disclosure and supplier greenhouse gas emissions: A signaling theory perspective

Sining Song, Jie Lian, Keith Skowronski, Tingting YanOperations供应链管理UTD24
Journal of Operations Management2023-07-25Knoxville College; University of Tennessee at Knoxville; University of South Carolina; Texas Tech UniversityDOI
Citations119
Influential2
References153
Semantic Scholar

Abstract As suppliers' emissions contribute to a significant portion of the global environmental footprint, achieving supply chain wide carbon neutrality largely depends on suppliers' greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reductions. Although suppliers' customers are increasingly signaling their commitment to tackling climate change through environmental disclosure, whether this signal contributes to supplier emissions reduction remains a question. Using signaling theory, this research proposes an emissions‐reducing effect of customer base environmental disclosure on a supplier's GHG emissions level. Using a 2010–2017 panel dataset from multiple sources, we find empirical evidence supporting the upstream emissions‐reducing effect of customer base environmental disclosure. Further, we identify two customer‐base characteristics that affect this relationship: customer base climate innovation and competition. These findings contribute to the sustainable supply chain management literature by illustrating the effects of the customer base on supplier emissions performance. Specifically, customers could motivate a supplier's engagement in emissions reduction by collectively signaling their environmental commitment through enhanced disclosure. However, the effectiveness of this signaling effect can be contingent on the green innovation and competitive dynamics of the customer base.

Greenhouse gasBusinessCustomer baseCarbon footprintSupply chainIndustrial organizationUpstream (networking)Environmental economicsMarketingEconomicsTelecommunicationsComputer science
Related Papers (8-Dimension Scoring)

The effect of customer and supplier concentrations on firm resilience during the <scp>COVID</scp>‐19 pandemic: Resource dependence and power balancing

Shenyang Jiang, Andy C.L. Yeung, Zhaojun Han, Baofeng Huo · Journal of Operations Management

Score: 70

Breaking out of the pandemic: How can firms match internal competence with external resources to shape operational resilience?

Yuan Li, Xincheng Wang, Tianyu Gong, Haifeng Wang · Journal of Operations Management

Score: 70

The impact of governmental <scp>COVID</scp>‐19 measures on manufacturers' stock market valuations: The role of labor intensity and operational slack

Lujie Chen, Taiyu Li, Fu Jia, Tobias Schoenherr · Journal of Operations Management

Score: 70

Impact of the U.S.–China trade war on the operating performance of U.S. firms: The role of outsourcing and supply base complexity

Di Fan, Yi Zhou, Andy C.L. Yeung, Chris K.Y. Lo, Christopher S. Tang · Journal of Operations Management

Score: 70

Developing supply chain resilience through integration: An empirical study on an e‐commerce platform

Yinan Qi, Xiaorui Wang, Min Zhang, Qiang Wang · Journal of Operations Management

Score: 70

Bespoke supply‐chain resilience: The gap between theory and practice

Morris A. Cohen, Shiliang Cui, Sebastian Doetsch, Ricardo Ernst, Arnd Huchzermeier, Panos Kouvelis, Hau L. Lee, Hirofumi Matsuo, Andy A. Tsay · Journal of Operations Management

Score: 70

Emerging technologies and the use case: A multi‐year study of drone adoption

Omid Maghazei, Michael Lewis, Torbjørn H. Netland · Journal of Operations Management

Score: 70

Antecedent configurations toward supply chain resilience: The joint impact of supply chain integration and big data analytics capability

Yisa Jiang, Taiwen Feng, Yufei Huang · Journal of Operations Management

Score: 65