Back to Papers

How information technology automates and augments processes: Insights from Artificial‐Intelligence‐based systems in professional service operations

Martin Spring, James Faulconbridge, Atif SarwarOperations运营分析UTD24
Journal of Operations Management2022-09-01Lancaster University; Liverpool Hope UniversityDOI
Citations189
Influential2
References57
Semantic Scholar

Abstract This study contributes to the technology management literature on the effects of IT on operations processes by examining the use of systems based on Artificial Intelligence (AI) in professional services. The paper builds on key concepts on AI, information systems, professional work, and professional services operations management. A model is developed to explain how AI‐based systems combine with humans to do work, both automating and augmenting the work of the professional, leading to process improvement and extension of the service offering. The study uses case‐based research in two law firms and two accountancy firms using AI‐based systems. It shows that AI‐based systems are used selectively, mainly on high‐volume, back‐office tasks, across the sequence of stages in the professional service process—diagnosis, inference, and treatment. Automation using AI relieves professionals from repetitive tasks, while AI achieves augmentation by buffering professionals from low‐value activity, making their expertise scalable and providing new analytical insights. System use can improve performance in delivering core professional services and enable service extension into additional, high‐value advisory work. The model and research approach have potential implications for other emerging areas of technology management in OM.

Computer scienceService (business)Knowledge managementAutomationScalabilityProcess (computing)Professional servicesInformation technology consultingInformation systemArtificial intelligenceEngineering managementProcess management
Related Papers (8-Dimension Scoring)

Task management in decentralized autonomous organization

Xi Zhao, Peilin Ai, Fujun Lai, Xin Luo, Jose Benitez · Journal of Operations Management

Score: 70

On making experimental design choices: Discussions on the use and challenges of demand effects, incentives, deception, samples, and vignettes

Stephanie Eckerd, Scott DuHadway, Elliot Bendoly, Craig R. Carter, Lutz Kaufmann · Journal of Operations Management

Score: 54

Commitment follows beliefs: A configurational perspective on operations managers' commitment to practice adoption

Maricela Arellano, Johannes Meuer, Torbjørn H. Netland · Journal of Operations Management

Score: 54

Antecedent configurations toward supply chain resilience: The joint impact of supply chain integration and big data analytics capability

Yisa Jiang, Taiwen Feng, Yufei Huang · Journal of Operations Management

Score: 50

Unintended responses to IT‐enabled monitoring: The case of the electronic logging device mandate

Alex Scott, Andrew Balthrop, Jason Miller · Journal of Operations Management

Score: 49

Breaking out of the pandemic: How can firms match internal competence with external resources to shape operational resilience?

Yuan Li, Xincheng Wang, Tianyu Gong, Haifeng Wang · Journal of Operations Management

Score: 45

Emerging technologies and the use case: A multi‐year study of drone adoption

Omid Maghazei, Michael Lewis, Torbjørn H. Netland · Journal of Operations Management

Score: 45

Digital transformation in operations management: Fundamental change through agency reversal

Spyros Angelopoulos, Elliot Bendoly, Jan C. Fransoo, Kai Hoberg, Carol Xiaojuan Ou, Antti Tenhiälä · Journal of Operations Management

Score: 45