Low‐Risk Anomalies?
ABSTRACT This paper shows that low‐risk anomalies in the capital asset pricing model and in traditional factor models arise when investors require compensation for coskewness risk. Empirically, we find that option‐implied ex ante skewness is strongly related to ex post residual coskewness, which allows us to construct coskewness factor‐mimicking portfolios. Controlling for skewness renders the alphas of betting‐against‐beta and betting‐against‐volatility insignificant. We also show that the returns of beta‐ and volatility‐sorted portfolios are driven largely by a single principal component, which in turn is explained largely by skewness.
Taming the Factor Zoo: A Test of New Factors
Guanhao Feng, Stefano Giglio, Dacheng Xiu · Journal of Finance
The Misguided Beliefs of Financial Advisors
Juhani T. Linnainmaa, Brian Melzer, Alessandro Previtero · Journal of Finance
What Matters to Individual Investors? Evidence from the Horse's Mouth
James J. Choi, Adriana Robertson · Journal of Finance
Do Intermediaries Matter for Aggregate Asset Prices?
Valentin Haddad, Tyler Muir · Journal of Finance
Global Pricing of Carbon‐Transition Risk
Patrick Bolton, Marcin Kacperczyk · Journal of Finance
Declining Labor and Capital Shares
Simcha Barkai · Journal of Finance
Subjective Cash Flow and Discount Rate Expectations
Ricardo De la O, Sean Myers · Journal of Finance
Anomalies and the Expected Market Return
Xi Dong, Yan Li, David E. Rapach, Guofu Zhou · Journal of Finance