Belief Disagreement and Portfolio Choice
ABSTRACT Using proprietary financial data on millions of households, we show that likely‐Republicans increased the equity share and market beta of their portfolios following the 2016 presidential election, while likely‐Democrats rebalanced into safe assets. We provide evidence that this behavior was driven by investors interpreting public information based on different models of the world. We use detailed controls to rule out the main nonbelief‐based channels such as income hedging needs, preferences, and local economic exposures. These findings are driven by a small share of investors making big changes, and are stronger among investors who trade more ex ante.
The Misguided Beliefs of Financial Advisors
Juhani T. Linnainmaa, Brian Melzer, Alessandro Previtero · Journal of Finance
The Wisdom of the Robinhood Crowd
Ivo Welch · Journal of Finance
How Debit Cards Enable the Poor to Save More
Pierre Bachas, Paul Gertler, Sean Higgins, Enrique Seira · Journal of Finance
Firm‐Level Climate Change Exposure
Zacharias Sautner, Laurence van Lent, Grigory Vilkov, RUISHEN ZHANG · Journal of Finance
Global Pricing of Carbon‐Transition Risk
Patrick Bolton, Marcin Kacperczyk · Journal of Finance
Tracking Retail Investor Activity
Ekkehart Boehmer, Charles M. Jones, Xiaoyan Zhang, Xinran Zhang, XINRAN ZHANG, XINRAN ZHANG · Journal of Finance
The Pollution Premium
PO‐HSUAN HSU, Kai Li, Chi-Yang Tsou · Journal of Finance
Attention‐Induced Trading and Returns: Evidence from Robinhood Users
Brad M. Barber, Xing Huang, Terrance Odean, Christopher G. Schwarz · Journal of Finance