Government Subsidies and Corporate Misconduct
ABSTRACT I study whether firms that receive targeted U.S. state‐level subsidies are more likely to subsequently engage in corporate misconduct. I find that firms are more likely to engage in misconduct in subsidizing states, but not in other states that they operate in, after receiving state subsidies. Using data on both federal and state enforcement actions, and exploiting the legal principle of dual sovereignty for identification, I show that this finding reflects an increase in the underlying rate of misconduct and that this increase is attributable to lenient state‐level misconduct enforcement. Collectively, my findings present evidence of an important consequence of targeted firm‐specific subsidies: nonfinancial misconduct that potentially could impact the very stakeholders subsidies are ostensibly intended to benefit.
Board Gender Diversity and Investment Efficiency: Global Evidence from 83 Country-Level Interventions
D. H. Baik, Clara Xiaoling Chen, David Godsell · The Accounting Review
Evolution in Value Relevance of Accounting Information
Mary E. Barth, Ken Li, Charles McClure · The Accounting Review
Why is Corporate Virtue in the Eye of The Beholder? The Case of ESG Ratings
Dane M. Christensen, George Serafeim, Anywhere Sikochi · The Accounting Review
Theory Testing and Process Evidence in Accounting Experiments
H. Scott Asay, Ryan Guggenmos, Kathryn Kadous, Lisa Koonce, Robert Libby · The Accounting Review
The Disclosure and Consequences of U.S. Critical Audit Matters
Jenna Burke, Rani Hoitash, Udi Hoitash, Summer Xiao · The Accounting Review
Deterrent Disclosure
Stephen Glaeser, Wayne R. Landsman · The Accounting Review
Understanding the Sustainability Reporting Landscape and Research Opportunities in Accounting
Patricia Dechow · The Accounting Review
The Real Effects of Mandatory Nonfinancial Disclosure: Evidence from Supply Chain Transparency
Guoman She · The Accounting Review